"10% of the population is able to own private property at the expense of the other 90%, so therefore we should just get rid of private property entirely so that 0% of the population owns it."
Or, maybe, hypothetically if this imaginary premise was true, we should instead focus on expanding private property ownership to the other 90%? Owning private property isn't a zero-sum game. Buying a car doesn't actively harm the people who can't afford it.
