Mi nombre es Alicia Aronsson, tengo 18 años y soy de Suecia. Estoy muy interesada en el puesto de bartender en el su bar, ya que me encanta trabajar en un ambiente dinámico y social.
Aunque no tengo mucha experiencia como bartender, he trabajado en servicio al cliente, lo que me ha permitido desarrollar habilidades como la comunicación, la resolución de problemas y el trabajo en equipo.
Además, soy una persona organizada, responsable y con muchas ganas de aprender. Hablo sueco, inglés y español, lo que me permite comunicarme fácilmente con personas de diferentes países.
Estoy especialmente interesada en trabajar en su bar porque valoro mucho la importancia de crear una buena experiencia para los clientes.
Estoy disponible para trabajar por las tardes, noches y fines de semana, y puedo adaptarme a diferentes horarios según las necesidades del equipo.
Agradezco mucho su tiempo y espero tener la oportunidad de conversar más sobre cómo puedo contribuir al éxito de su bar.
Die meisten schreiben die Entwicklung der Blockchain-Technologie Satoshi Nakamoto zu, der die Idee 2008 in einem Whitepaper beschrieb.* Eigentlich müssten wir aber Scott Stornetta und Stuart Haber danken. Sie lernten sich bei Bell Labs kennen. Scott hat einen Doktortitel in theoretischer Physik von der Stanford University; Stuart hat einen Doktortitel in Computerwissenschaften von der Columbia. Sie waren Mitverfasser eines bahnbrechenden Papers, in dem ihr Konzept 1991 beschrieben wurde (und das 1992 mit dem Discover Award für Computersoftware ausgezeichnet wurde). Von den acht Zitaten in Satoshis Whitepaper von 2008 beziehen sich drei auf die Arbeit von Scott und Stu.** Warum ist Satoshi dann so viel berühmter? Nun ja, Satoshi löste das Problem, welches das Funktionieren der Blockchain-Technologie verhindert hatte.
La empresa de reparto Glovo ha anunciado que deja atrás su modelo de falsos autónomos, por el que acumula millones de euros en sanciones de Inspección y cotizaciones impagadas y por el que su consejero delegado, Oscar Pierre, está siendo investigado en un proceso penal, acusado de un delito contra los derechos de los trabajadores. La empresa de origen catalán hace este anuncio solo un día antes de la cita de Pierre ante el juez. A partir de ahora, explica la compañía, pasan a un modelo 100% laboral, en el que sus repartidores serán trabajadores con contratos al uso, sin autónomos de por medio. El Ministerio de Trabajo estima que este anuncio de Glovo significará la regularización de 60.000 personas que han repartido para Glovo desde 2021, “el movimiento afiliativo más importante de las historia de España”, ha dicho la vicepresidenta segunda y responsable de Trabajo, Yolanda Díaz. La empresa asegura que opera con unos 15.000 riders en España
“La tecnológica española Glovo ha decidido impulsar un nuevo modelo en España que permitirá la operativa con repartidores laborales. Esta decisión y apuesta se produce como parte de su firme compromiso con España y con el impulso de la economía digital en el país”, dice Glovo en un comunicado enviado a los medios este lunes. “El cambio de modelo”, prosigue la compañía, “incluirá la totalidad de ciudades en las que Glovo está disponible, que actualmente superan las 900, y se aplicará a todas las verticales de la aplicación. El nuevo modelo mantendrá en todo momento la experiencia de usuario y de los restaurantes y establecimientos que colaboran con la aplicación en todo el país”.
A nation’s primary responsibility is to ensure the well-being of its citizens, prioritizing their basic needs such as food, shelter, and employment. When significant numbers of people are hungry or unemployed, the idea of allocating government resources to the arts may seem like a misplaced priority. While I agree that during times of acute crises, such as widespread hunger or unemployment, governments should prioritize essential needs, I mostly disagree with the notion of entirely suspending funding for the arts. This is because the arts play a vital role in a nation's cultural identity, mental well-being, and long-term economic recovery. Below, I will explain why balanced funding, rather than suspension, is a more pragmatic approach.
Obviously, it's no mean feat to create a modern Christmas classic. Such artists as Taylor Swift, Justin Bieber and The Killers (to name a few) have tried, but all their original songs have failed to stick. For Nate Sloan, musicologist and co-host of the podcast Switched On Pop, what makes successful Christmas songs hard to write is that "it's the only time there's an exception to the rule that pop artists should innovate and create new sounds". Sloan points out that even when such contemporary artists as Dua Lipa or Bruno Mars reference old sounds like disco or new jack swing in their music, it "has to sound new and fresh… [whereas] when December rolls around there's this completely contrary impulse [from audiences], which is to go back in time to the 1940s and '50s with Bing Crosby and Brenda Lee." Mariah loves Christmas, and it just so happens that something she absolutely loves is also able to generate her continued goodwill, streams of income and resources.
(somewhat) said slurping slurping also slurping
When it was first released in 1994, it made a mere ripple – but 30 years on, it is a track that reigns supreme over the holiday season. What is the secret of its success? There are now three things that are certain in life: taxes, death and that every December Mariah Carey's All I Want for Christmas is You will be inescapable. Whether you're in a shopping mall or at an office party, whether you're listening to the radio or a holiday streaming playlist, you know the festive season has begun when you hear the first notes of Carey's classic song. Released 30 years ago, All I Want for Christmas is You has jingled its way into the pantheon of yuletide standards alongside Blue Christmas, Rockin' Around the Christmas Tree, and It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year. The track was a relatively modest hit when it first came out in 1994, hitting number 12 on Billboard's all-genre Radio Songs tally in the United States and number two in the United Kingdom (blocked by East 17's Stay Another Day) and Japan. That should have been the end of the story. But All I Want for Christmas is You kept coming back stronger and more popular each holiday season. The song has now topped the charts in over 25 countries including the US and the UK, and was officially crowned the greatest holiday song of all time based on commercial performance by Billboard in 2023. The success and cultural staying power of All I Want for Christmas is You is staggering. Which raises the question: Why (and how) did Carey's beloved song become as synonymous with Christmas as Santa Claus himself?
Bob Bryar, former drummer for American rock band My Chemical Romance (MCR), has died aged 44 at his Tennessee home, according to US media. He was the longest-serving drummer for the group, playing with the band from 2004 to 2010. A spokesperson for the band told US outlets that the "band asks for your patience and understanding as they process the news of Bob’s passing". Bryar joined MCR after the release of their second album and helped write songs for the acclaimed record The Black Parade, deemed a "defining album" by NPR Music.
Biden may be criticised as well – for breaking his promise and for using his presidential power to protect his son. With his political career drawing to a close, however, there is likely to be little price the outgoing president will pay for his actions. The national attention will quickly shift back to the incoming Trump presidency. The rules governing presidential pardoning – or at the very least the processes and established guardrails that had guided its use – appear to have been fundamentally and permanently altered. And at this point there may be scarce grounds for anyone to complain, no matter on which side of the political aisle they stand.
Joe Biden’s explanation for pardoning his son is that Hunter Biden has been unfairly targeted by the president’s own political enemies in an attempt to politically damage him. That might sound familiar to anyone who has listened to Donald Trump rail against America’s system of justice in recent years. Trump, as he exited the White House in 2021, issued a series of pardons for his close associates and allies who had been swept up in the multiple criminal investigations that encircled him throughout his presidential term. Although he was criticised for his actions at the time, there were little if any political consequences.
Joe Biden’s explanation for pardoning his son is that Hunter Biden has been unfairly targeted by the president’s own political enemies in an attempt to politically damage him. That might sound familiar to anyone who has listened to Donald Trump rail against America’s system of justice in recent years. Trump, as he exited the White House in 2021, issued a series of pardons for his close associates and allies who had been swept up in the multiple criminal investigations that encircled him throughout his presidential term. Although he was criticised for his actions at the time, there were little if any political consequences.
Wendy wore her favorite yellow raincoat as she splashed through the puddles after a heavy downpour. A wobbly umbrella in her hand kept most of the rain away, but her boots were covered in muddy water. She laughed as the wind swirled around her, making the umbrella spin like a whirly top!
HILS, LLC
1234 West Main Street
Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402
4 December 2024
Mr. Client
7707 Kingston Pike
Knoxville, TN 37919
Confidential Attorney/Client Communication
Re: liability for X
Dear Mr. Client:
My deepest condolences on X. I know this is a difficult time, and I appreciate your trust in allowing us to assist you. You recently asked HILS LLC to review your X, which is now disputed by Y.
Although the weight of the law is technically in your favor, there is a possibility that a decision would go against you, especially given the emotional value of the facts of the case. There was a case where a court ruled against X in somewhat similar circumstances.
Therefore, I would like you to read this letter carefully to understand the legal issues. I will first set out the facts as I understand them. Then, I will analyze the pertinent state law and lastly conclude by suggesting possible options I would like you to consider.
The facts described below are based on our interview with you as well as the complaint. You may not agree with some of the facts in the complaint. Yet our analysis has to consider the worst-case scenario as to what Plaintiff may argue in court.
However, if you see any facts that you think are wrong; please let me know. Cases are won and lost based on the facts.
시간, last month, 누가, a minor and an adult, purchased alcohol, 어디서, at your store and consumed it on premises in the store cafe. At first, ~; After paying, ~; Then ~. victim is now suing the A.
As a technical matter, the law says that X are never liable. (General) But the state legislature made two very narrow exceptions: if ~; (Specific, exception)
A B usually means C. However, there is a case where ~, yet ~ (facts). The court held that it did not matter that ~C. (Holding)
The court did not want the B to escape liability for C to A. The court said it would be absurd to ~ (court reasoning) - Negative cases
However, in every other case, where ~ those A were found not liable because ~C. There are examples where (facts). Those A are not liable because they did not C. - Positive cases
Unfortunately, yours are a hard case without a clear outcome. Technically, ~ does not seem liable because ~ .
But (Facts). These facts look bad especially considering how sympathetic the plaintiff looks. A court may not care that you are technically right. At least one court has stretched the law to include a similar scenario.
Hence, here are some options to consider.
First, we could try to get the case;
Second,
Third,
Please note that you have 30 days to respond to the complaint or risk the default judgment entered against you. I would be happy to discuss this matter with you further. Please feel free to call me at 123-456-7890, if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
HILS LCC
- You asked me to research whether X is liable for Y (detailed facts);
- Specifically, whether main issue;
- Technically, we should win. But the facts look bad and case precedent shows judges sometimes find a way to hold against defendants like us. A jury would be even less sympathetic.
In this case, fact;
As this case hinges on whether “word” definition, this memo will focus on that element.
X may be liable for X because (1) the public policy and legislative intent allow a court to reach this out come; (2) the case law allows a court to reach this outcome; and (3) a court may want to reach this outcome based on the equity of the facts, which weight against our client.
In general, X (code). (101번 내용)
However, Y creates an exception (102번 내용)
The Y was enacted to protect Y like 이름 from liability. (Case name). Moreover, Plaintiff’s burden of proof is very high: beyond a reasonable doubt. Yet, an exception was created to protect A.
Under a plain reading of the word “B,” it seems like Y. However, the term “B” is not defined. Rather, “all relevant circumstances will be considered in determining whether there was a ‘B.’” (Case name)
Our Supreme Court has held that when X, the B has not been liable for C. (Case name) Even the judge in case name, in a later case, when a A, held such facts did not equal a B to that A. Case name. Moreover, as the X abrogated the old common law rule, it is irrelevant whether the A could B. There is no liability unless C.
In contrast, in case name, a judge held A even if B. There, (1); (2); (3). The judge said A is merely one factor to consider and is not dispositive in finding whether there was a A. To hold otherwise would defeat the purpose of the A law if, for example, B.
Here, 팩트 하나씩 찬찬히 쪼개기; Considering there “circumstances,” to effectuate legislative intent to punish “bad actors” and protect A, a court might find that there was B even though C.
Technically, according to our Supreme Court in case name, there has to be A. Legally, it absolutely does not matter whether B. But in the case name, fact — a point the Appellate Court noted in reaching its opposite conclusion in case name.
Moreover, we can argue that from an economic and public policy perspective, a ruling against our client would be harmful to the X the act was mean to protect. It could lead to unforeseen outcomes such as A.
We should also argue that the C li not liable under A law. If a X, like, cannot be liable,why should the C be liable? If the A rather than B, the A would not be liable! Also, we can note that A did the right thing by B and that we have no duty to C.
In conclusion, while, technically, our client should prevail, a court might be tempted to issue an unpublished, non-precedent case as in the case name. If this case goes to a jury, we are even more likely to lose.
Finally, A may wish to coordinate a defense with the B whose members will be affected by a negative decision.
Thank you for the opportunity to research this issue. I wish I had a better answer for our client. Let me know if you’d like any follow up including reaching out to the A.
(somewhat) said that cool down serves before enjoying
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Battery: An act by the defendant which brings about harmful or offensive contact to the plaintiff’s person; 2)Intent on the part of the defendant to bring about harmful or offensive contact to the plaintiff’s person; and 3)Causation.
Assault: "An act by the defendant creating a reasonable apprehension in plaintiff of immediate harmful or offensive contact to plaintiff’s person; 2)Intent on the part of the defendant to bring about in the plaintiff apprehension of immediate harmful or offensive contact with the plaintiff’s person; and 3)Causation."
False Imprisonment: An act or omission to act on the part of the defendant that confines or restrains the plaintiff to a bounded area;
2)Intent on the part of the defendant to confine or restrain the plaintiff to a bounded area; and 3)Causation. Sufficient Methods of Confinement or Restraint Actionable confinement or restraint may result in a variety of ways. The following should be noted:
1) Physical Barriers Defendant may falsely imprison plaintiff by confining him through the use of physical barriers.
2) Physical Force. False imprisonment will result where plaintiff is restrained by the use of physical force directed at him or a member of his immediate family. An action may also lie if the force is directed against plaintiff’s property. Invalid Use of Legal Authority
The invalid use of legal authority amounts to false imprisonment if it results in a confinement of plaintiff.
a) False Arrests: An action for false imprisonment does not lie for an arrest or a detention made by virtue of legal process duly issued by a court or official having jurisdiction to issue it. However, where an arrest by a police officer or private citizen for a criminal offense without a warrant is unlawful (i.e., not privileged), it may constitute false imprisonment. (1) When Arrests Are Privileged (a) Felony Arrests Without Warrant A felony arrest without a warrant by a police officer (or a private citizen acting at the officer’s direction) is valid if the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that a felony has been committed and that the person arrested has committed it. Such an arrest by a private person will be privileged only if a felony has in fact been committed and the private person has reasonable grounds for believing that the person arrested has committed it.
(b) Misdemeanor Arrests Without Warrant. Both police officers and private citizens are privileged for misdemeanor arrests without a warrant if the misdemeanor was a breach of the peace and was committed in the presence of the arresting party. (Note that in most states, police officers have a broader statutory privilege of arrest for any misdemeanor committed in their presence.) (c) Arrests to Prevent a Crime Without a Warrant Where a felony or breach of the peace is in the process of being, or reasonably appears about “Shoplifting” Detentions Are Privileged What if a shopkeeper suspects someone of shoplifting and detains that individual to ascertain whether this is the case? He may be liable for false imprisonment. But if he does nothing and permits the suspect to simply leave the premises, the merchandise and all possibilities of proving theft will be lost. Hence, by statute in some states and case law in others, shopkeepers have been given a privilege to detain for investigation. For the privilege to apply, the following conditions must be satisfied: (1) There must be a reasonable belief as to the fact of theft; (2) The detention must be conducted in a reasonable manner and only nondeadly force can be used; and (3) The detention must be only for a reasonable period of time and only for the purpose of making an investigation.
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: "An act by defendant amounting to extreme and outrageous conduct; 2) Intent on the part of defendant to cause plaintiff to suffer severe emotional distress, or recklessness as to the effect of defendant’s conduct;
3)Causation; and 4)Damages—severe emotional distress." Extreme and Outrageous Conduct 1) Some Courts Reluctant to Recognize Tort This tort covers those situations where the defendant intentionally “shocks” the plaintiff but there is no physical injury or threat thereof. Some states have been reluctant to recognize this as a cause of action because of the difficulty of proving “shock” (and the ease with which it could be falsified), the speculative nature of the damage, and fear of a flood of litigation. 2) Liability Limited by Requiring Proof of Outrageous Conduct To protect against potential abuses, the courts will limit liability for this tort to those situations where “outrageous conduct” on the part of the defendant is proved. “Outrageous conduct” is conduct that transcends all bounds of decency tolerated by society. In the absence of such conduct by the defendant, it is generally held that an average person of ordinary sensibilities would not suffer the kind of severe mental injury that is contemplated by the tort. 3) Examples of Outrageous Conduct a) Extreme Business Conduct, Certain extreme methods of business conduct may be construed as outrageous conduct, e.g., use of extreme methods of collection, if repeated, may be actionable. b) Misuse of Authority Misuse of authority in some circumstances may be actionable, e.g., school authorities threatening and bullying pupils. c) Offensive or Insulting Language Generally, offensive or insulting language will not be characterized as “outrageous conduct.” This result could change if there is a special relationship between plaintiff and defendant or a sensitivity on plaintiff’s part of which defendant is aware. 4) Special Relationship Situations Common carriers and innkeepers owe special duties to their patrons that will be a basis for liability even when the act is something less than outrageous, e.g., bus driver making insulting remarks to passenger. 5) Known Sensitivity. If defendant knows that plaintiff is more sensitive and thus more susceptible to emotional distress than the average person, liability will follow if the defendant uses extreme and outrageous conduct intentionally to cause such distress and succeeds. These rules may also apply where defendant’s conduct is directed at individuals in certain groups such as children, pregnant women, and elderly people. c. Intent Defendant will be liable not only for intentional conduct but also for reckless conduct, i.e., acting in reckless disregard of a high probability that emotional distress will result.
d. Causation The defendant’s conduct must have proximately caused the plaintiff’s emotional distress. 1) Intent/Causation Requirements in Bystander Cases When the defendant‘s conduct is directed at a third person and the plaintiff suffers severe emotional distress, the elements of intent and causation may be harder to prove. To establish these elements in such cases, the plaintiff is generally required to show the following: a) The plaintiff was present at the time; b) The distress resulted in bodily harm, or the plaintiff was a close relative of the third party; and c) The defendant knew these facts.
Tresspass to Land: "An act of physical invasion of plaintiff’s real property by defendant; 2)Intent on defendant’s part to bring about a physical invasion of plaintiff’s real property; and
3)Causation."
Swift-Tuttle 133-year meteor Perseus.
Nonprobate property is property that is not subject to the rules of descent and distribution and does not require determination of ownership through the probate court. Properties, such as things jointly owned, insurance policies, pay on death or transfer on death contracts and inter vivos trusts, are classified as non-probate property and bypass the probate process.
Under joint tenancy laws, when a tenant dies and owns a thing jointly with others, the remaining tenants have a right of survivorship, meaning the deceased tenant’s share of the thing owned jointly is automatically redistributed among the surviving tenants. The tenant’s share is not divisible, alienable, or descendible.
Inter vivos trust passes according to the terms of the trust.
Life insurance is a contract that provides proceeds to the named beneficiary in the insurance contract.
Where there is a pay on death or transfer on death contractions, the account custodian distributes property to the named beneficiary at decedent’s death.
Probate property is property left by the decedent that must go through the probate court to be divided amongst the heirs of the estate by will or intestacy. Probate property Includes personal property and real property that has not been disposed of by contract.
