I have done it, 80 years and not a single nut bust. Thanks to my incredible goal i have obtained an iq of 156 which i have used to build a pc that deletes system 32 when it loads any type of NSFW. I'm currently in a hospital bed dying of terminal disease, however, this is a victory as in 72 hours i'm expected to die. Wish me luck in this final run.
You're quite the fool @ inb4_weesin. More often that not, when I point out that someone has made errors in their quote, the reponse is them thanking me for pointing it out so that they could submit changes to their quote to fix the issues. It is the mark of a truly emotionally immature person to be unable to handle critcism (whether constructive or otherwise). What you've done is attack my character. What I did was simply point out that you had errors in your quote. Be mature. Take criticism and fix your errors. I would appreciate if you don't waste my time trying to malign me in this fashion...it's a waste of your time and my time as I simply don't care what someone of your moral stature has to say. Grow up
"would taking the time to capitalize words have been too difficult?" "If your ego is too fragile to handle being questioned like that, perhaps you should refrain from posting quotes for the public to type" I regret to inform you that these are indeed, attacks on my character, whether or not you choose to see them that way is not up to me. Additionally, I never explicitly stated that I meant just your comments toward me, I said "your posts", which meant that you, as a person seem to find enjoyment out of going out of your way to attack people on a typing website for god's sake. Also, I'm pretty sure you just learned the meaning of the word "verbose", as it means to express an idea in far more words than is actually warranted, I feel like I've been very frank with my thoughts to be honest, while you seem to just use your slightly above average vocabulary as some sort of status symbol.
@inb4_weesin, I feel as though you just learnt the word "ad hominem" but don't seem to know what it means. I have not attacked your character or motives, therefore, I have not employed an ad hominem tactic to our discourse. Instead, I questioned the matter at hand directly....which was the poor construction of your quote. Maybe before you post a "verbose" comment to me regarding my use of ad hominem arguments, you should first have a basic understanding of what that term means.
I questioned the composition of your quote....if your ego is too fragile to handle being questioned like that, perhaps you should refrain from posting quotes for the public to type. There's a reply/comment function for a reason...
I'm sorry, something may have gotten lost in translation, so allow me to ask, among all of your posts and comments, why do so many have Ad Hominem garbage in it? I understand constructive criticism, but your supposedly "verbose" and "witty" insults really do nothing but birth arguements like this, cause miscommunications, and is generally pretty stupid. Honestly I wouldn't be having this conversation with you if you treated people with the most basic amount of respect, but it seems like you're having some difficulty reaching the ground from up on that high horse lmao
There's a difference between my making an error in a post that only affects one person (you, the reader) and you making multiple errors in a post that affects many users. Also, you don't have to re-type my errors as you're expecting the people who type your quote to re-trype your errors
There's casual writing (e.g. my comment to you) and then there's more formal writing (e.g. quotes that you submit for hundreds/thousands of other users to type)
I mean if we wanna get anal about grammar and shit, sure, why not. You typed "multiples", when it should have been multiple. It's also redundant to say "you have typed", this isn't passive tense, you're in first person friend, it would be more apt to say "you typed". Also, I dont know why you felt the need to point out the fact that I capitalized "NSFW", I mean thanks for the compliment I guess. Regardless, it's kinda hypocritical to correct me on my grammar like that while adding in the ad hominem.