He who has an ear, let him hear what the Spirit says to the churches. To him who overcomes, I will give some of the hidden manna. I will also give him a white stone with a new name written on it, known only to him who receives it.
The revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave him to show his servants what must soon take place. He made it known by sending his angel to his servant John, 2 who testifies to everything he saw--that is, the word of God and the testimony of Jesus Christ. 3 Blessed is the one who reads the words of this prophecy, and blessed are those who hear it and take to heart what is written in it, because the time is near.
1. 1) The Spirits and Flesh of the Wedding Banquet of the Lamb. 2) The bridegroom, the spirits and the bride, the flesh, becoming one and living together.
2. 1) Lamp: Word of Bible (prophecy). 2) Oil: Word of testimony of the witness (physical fulfilment). 3) Wedding clothes: Righteous acts.
3. 1) The one who overcomes, Rev 3:12. 2) God’s word.
4. 1) Rv2: Jezebel: caused servants to commit adultery, belongs to the devil. 2) Rv12: the woman clothed with sun, moon, and stars: gave birth to a male child who will rule all nation, belongs to God. 3) Rv17: the prostitute: gave birth to the children of the devil, belongs to the devil. 4) Rv19: the bride of the Lamb: prepares the wedding supper, belongs to God.
5. 1) The judgment of Babylon in Rev 18. 2) Because God’s people captured in Babylon have not yet all come out, Rev 18:4.
6. 1) Mt 22, Mt 25, Lk 13. 2) Wedding of the spirits and flesh, God’s return and reign.
7. 1) God eternally protects and loves His chosen people. 2) The kingdom of heaven, God, Jesus, and the martyrs coming to Shincheonji, and eternal life fulfils.
8. The greatest truth of the 6,000 years of God’s work (Revealed word of the fulfilled realities of the New Testament Revelation).
9. 1) Two kinds of churches (God’s church and the devil’s church). 2) Truth and false truth. 3) Fight (war).
10. God’s kingdom and salvation, Rev 12.
[Why Israel is reluctant in adopting a Constitution]
Having a constitution highlights all powers, restrictions and due process of law in a nation. Important provisions such as citizenship, treatment of foreigners, applicability of law and jurisdiction are essential. Nonetheless, Israel’s reluctance in adopting a formal Constitution stems from their aim to continue occupation and expanding settlements.
If Israel has a formal Constitution, they would have to recognise Palestinians’ rights, citizenship status and territorial jurisdiction.
For example, the Basic Law : Human Dignity and Liberty offers protection to Israeli settlers in the West Bank whilst Palestinians does not have protection. Our question is, how does a foreign law apply in another nation?
In the case of Silwad Municipality v The Knesset, the court invalidated the Land Regularisation Act which provided a mechanism to expropriate usage rights on private Palestinian land on which settlements are built in exchange for compensation. The invalidation is based on it being ultra vires with Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty.
The Court refuses to determine the general applicability of this law; whether Palestinians may also enjoy protection from it. Chief Justice Hayut even stated ‘there was no need’ to decide on such.
The intentional use of selective constitutional law allows grey areas to continue. These legal grey areas are beneficial for the occupation and expansion of settler projects to continue as;
1) It is unclear on which law is applicable
2) It is unknown whether Israeli settlers can be sued for trespass
3) It is unknown whether Palestinians can enjoy protection
4) It is unclear whether the West Bank forms part of Israel or is sovereign (as foreign Israeli law is applicable to settlers & disputes)
With these uncertainties, where does Palestinians seek redress? Any country with equal rights may apply for injunction at Court, sue squatters for trespass and claim damages. This is entirely unavailable for Palestinians as the legal system created by Israel allows for continues oppression.
Right Right Right Right Right
Right Right Right Right Right
Right Right Right Right Right
Right Right Right Right Right
Right Right Right Right Right
Right Right Right Right Right
Right Right Right Right Right
Right Right Right Right Right
Right Right Right Right Right
Right Right Right Right Right
destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed
destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed
destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed
destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed
destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed
destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed
destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed
destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed
destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed
destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed destroyed
affluence /a-floo-uhns/ n. abundance; wealth. Foreigners are amazed by the affluence and luxury of the American way of life.
aftermath /af-tr-math/ n. consequences; outcome; upshot. People around the world wondered what the aftermath of China's violent suppression of the student protests would be.
agent /ay-jnt/ n. means or instrument; personal representative. "I will be the agent of America's destruction," proclaimed the beady-eyed villian.
aggrandize /uh-gran-dize/ v. increase or intensify. The history of the past quarter century illustrates how a President may aggrandize his power to act aggressively in international affairs without considering the wishes of Congress.
aggressor /uh-greh-sr/ n. attacker. Before you punish both boys for fighting, see whether you can determine which one was the aggressor.
agility /uh-ji-luh-tee/ n. nimbleness. The agility of the acrobat amazed and thrilled the audience.
agnostic /uhg-naa-stuhk/ n. one who is skeptical of the existence or knowability of a god or any ultimate reality. Agnostic say we can neither prove nor disprove the existence of god; we simply just can't know.
dc dc dc dc dc dicks cocks crumbs chicken cholesterol crime child macy day cake career cave cake cale cart vices cd cd cd cd cd cd cd crane chart candle crying cordial crux cd cd cd dc dc dc ddd ccc dcd cdc
acumen /a-kyuh-muhn/ n. mental keenness. His business acumen helped him to succeed where others had failed.
adage /a-duhj/ n. wise saying; proverb. There is much truth in the old adage about fools and their money.
adapt /uh-dapt/ v. alter; modify. Some species of animals have become extinct because they could not adapt to a changing environment.
addiction /uh-dik-shn/ n. compulsive, habitual need. His addiction to drugs caused his friends much grief.
address /uh-dres/ v. direct a speech to; deal with or discuss. Due to address the convention in July, Brown planned to address the issue of low-income housing in his speech.
adhere /uhd-heer/ v. stick fast to. I will adhere to this opinion until proof that I am wrong is presented.
adjacent /uh-jay-snt/ adj. adjoining; neighboring; close by. Philip's best friend Jason lived only four houses down the block, close but not immediately adjacent.
admonish /uhd-maa-nuhsh/ v. warn; reprove. He admonished his listeners to change their wicked ways.
adorn /uh-dorn/ v. decorate. Wall paintings and carved statues adorned the temple.
Hola, mi nombre es Carmen Julia Bustamante mi numero de cedula es 20234561, mi telefono es 323451 y mi correo es carmenju@outlook.com
i know its all wrong by rights we shouldnt even be here but we are its like in the great stories mr frodo the ones that really mattered full of darkness and danger they were and sometimes you didnt want to know the end because how could the end be happy how could the world go back to the way it was when so much bad had happened but in the end its only a passing thing this shadow even darkness must pass a new day will come and when the sun shines it will shine out the clearer those were the stories that stayed with you that meant something even if you were to small to understand why but i think mr frodo i do understand i know now folk in those stories had lots of chances of turning back only they didnt they kept going because they were holding on to something that theres some good in this world mr frodo and its worth fighting for
Fly under the radar
Get a grip
Get your feet wet
Jump through hoops
Off the hook
Over the counter
Take a hike
Under the table
Nazuna fucking dies once again in The Last Stand. When will she finally stop being tenderized like a 4th of July BBQ by Chargers? How many licks from a Smoker does it take to get to the center of a Nazuna pop (star)? The world may never know.
West 1776 West 1849 West 25,000, West.
West 1776 West 1849 West 25,000 West.
West 1773 West 1849 West 25,000 West.
Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution
Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution
Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution
Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution
Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution
Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution
Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution
Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution
Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution
Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution Constitution
Under Rule 14(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a defendant may bring a third party into a pending lawsuit when that third party "is or may be liable to [the defendant] for all or part
of the claim against [the defendant]." Here, the woman properly brought the insurance company into the action by having a summons and third-party complaint served on the company. The woman's third-party complaint properly alleged that the insurance company would be liable to indemnify her if she were found liable to the man. A federal district court can exercise personal jurisdiction over a third-party defendant who is brought into a lawsuit pursuant to Rule 14(a) if the defendant has minimum contacts with the State in which the court sits or if the defendant is served with process at a place within a judicial district of the United States and within 100 miles of the place where the summons was issued.
Here, even though the insurance company did not have minimum contacts with State B sufficient to exercise general personal jurisdiction, it was served within a judicial district of the United States and in a location that was no more than 10 miles from the district court clerk’s office, in Small Town, that issued the summons. While Rule 4(k) (“the 100-mile-bulge rule”) provides the most direct resolution of whether the court can exercise personal jurisdiction on these facts, the court also has specific personal jurisdiction over the defendant insurance company because the insurance policy imposed a “duty to defend” the woman and because it can be reasonably implied from the facts that the insurance company’s territorial coverage included State B, where the accident occurred.
Appeals from the decisions of federal district courts ordinarily can be taken only when there is a "final judgment" in a case. But immediate appeals of decisions are permitted under Rule 54(b) if
the district court "expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay" of the appeal and "direct[s] entry of a final judgment," thus certifying the matter as appropriate for appeal. Thus the woman can appeal the court's dismissal of her third-party complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction if the district court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay and enters a final judgment on her claim. The court should make such a determination because (1) the court’s dismissal of her third-party claim is a final decision on her claim against the insurance company, (2) she would be prejudiced by a delay in her appeal, and (3) allowing the appeal
would not disrupt the ongoing proceedings in the court below or otherwise disturb the orderly administration of judicial business.
The court should exclude from evidence the illegal narcotics found in the clear medicine bottle because the officer's seizure of the bottle and its contents violated Homeowner's Fourth Amendment rights. All warrants must comply with the Fourth Amendment’s particularity clause, which requires that warrants "particularly describe" the "things to be seized." The particularity of a warrant is
evaluated based on the time it was issued and the information that the police officers who secured the warrant provided (or should have provided) to the issuing judicial officer. The requirement of particularity serves to limit police discretion, giving the warrant-executing police officer authority to search only for those things the magistrate has authorized.
Here, the seizure of the medicine bottle violated the Fourth Amendment because the search warrant was for counterfeit bills, and bills could not be concealed inside a two-inch-tall, clear medicine bottle. The plain-view doctrine does not apply here to justify the seizure. Unlike the computer, the illegal nature of the pills could not be immediately determined at the time of the search but required subsequent lab testing.
Hi TS! I'm opening this high priority sherlock because my manager checked in with me this morning to check on my progress towards creating those reports. You know, the ones we talked about last month. I actually haven't started yet and would really like to have this done by EOD. Is there any chance you'd have time available sometime today from 1-4PM to look at this with me? I don't have any specific questions prepared right now, but once we are on call, I'll be sure to ask them. Let me know if you'd like me to forward you the relevant details. They are necessary for you to understand what I am asking. Thanks in advance! -Analyst
